Total Disaster Programs in Pike County, Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 394
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Pike County, Indiana totaled $6,161,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Small Grain Farms | Monroe City, IN 47557 | $528,098 |
2 | Ams Farms | Monroe City, IN 47557 | $433,632 |
3 | Small Grain Farms Gp | Monroe City, IN 47557 | $336,593 |
4 | Jeffrey Keith Brenton | Petersburg, IN 47567 | $228,522 |
5 | Oakdale Partners | Jasper, IN 47546 | $200,046 |
6 | Joshua D Collins | Hazleton, IN 47640 | $150,583 |
7 | Brenton Grain & Excavating LLC | Petersburg, IN 47567 | $134,926 |
8 | Doug Wininger | Velpen, IN 47590 | $117,561 |
9 | Myreon Leland Krohn | Oakland City, IN 47660 | $106,402 |
10 | James N Seitz | Otwell, IN 47564 | $101,629 |
11 | Jason Althoff | Monroe City, IN 47557 | $90,655 |
12 | Gary D Collins | Hazleton, IN 47640 | $88,140 |
13 | R J Adams Farms Inc | Petersburg, IN 47567 | $87,344 |
14 | Scott & Michelle Parker Farms Inc | Monroe City, IN 47557 | $86,503 |
15 | Michael A Ison | Greenwood, IN 46143 | $85,803 |
16 | Larry Delbert Foust | Petersburg, IN 47567 | $80,757 |
17 | Joseph Alan Dickson | Winslow, IN 47598 | $77,177 |
18 | Michael D Horrall | Petersburg, IN 47567 | $73,371 |
19 | Randall Ennis | Petersburg, IN 47567 | $67,116 |
20 | Steve Ennis | Petersburg, IN 47567 | $65,323 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>