Farm Subsidy information
Ripley County, Indiana
Total Subsidies in Ripley County, Indiana, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 737
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Ripley County, Indiana totaled $11,500,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Agri Business Finance ** | St Paris, OH 43072 | $283,785 |
2 | Jolly Brothers Farm LLC | Versailles, IN 47042 | $249,097 |
3 | Mapnap Farm Inc | Batesville, IN 47006 | $205,419 |
4 | Daniel L Speer | Holton, IN 47023 | $181,306 |
5 | Mark Back | Cross Plains, IN 47017 | $177,816 |
6 | Dixon Farms LLC | Milan, IN 47031 | $159,783 |
7 | Roger A Miller | Holton, IN 47023 | $135,532 |
8 | Nicholas A Simon | Osgood, IN 47037 | $131,729 |
9 | Gilead Farms LLC | Osgood, IN 47037 | $124,369 |
10 | Brinda Back | Cross Plains, IN 47017 | $118,545 |
11 | Diana Bright | North Vernon, IN 47265 | $111,011 |
12 | Geisler Farms Inc | Versailles, IN 47042 | $108,778 |
13 | Dieckmann Farms LLC | Osgood, IN 47037 | $106,790 |
14 | John Matthew Werner | Versailles, IN 47042 | $104,986 |
15 | Ertel Farms Inc | Osgood, IN 47037 | $103,915 |
16 | Weber Brothers | Sunman, IN 47041 | $102,973 |
17 | G & D Family Farms Inc | Osgood, IN 47037 | $94,552 |
18 | Chris Linville | Osgood, IN 47037 | $90,203 |
19 | Harmeyer Farms Inc | Batesville, IN 47006 | $87,918 |
20 | Comer Farm Operations LLC | Holton, IN 47023 | $87,295 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>