Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments in Vermillion County, Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 53
Recipients of Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments from farms in Vermillion County, Indiana totaled $739,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Wildfires and Hurricane Indemnity Program Payments 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Walker Place | Danville, IL 61832 | $165,759 |
2 | David C Dunham | Cayuga, IN 47928 | $68,001 |
3 | Dustin Dunham | Cayuga, IN 47928 | $47,456 |
4 | Nancy L Noggle | Cayuga, IN 47928 | $43,129 |
5 | Keith Little Farms Inc | Kingman, IN 47952 | $40,193 |
6 | Lisa Suzette Martin | Kingman, IN 47952 | $32,153 |
7 | Matthew Scott Martin | Kingman, IN 47952 | $32,150 |
8 | Sally Anne Martin | Kingman, IN 47952 | $27,532 |
9 | Larry Dean Martin | Kingman, IN 47952 | $27,525 |
10 | Hicks Crum Farms LLC | Perrysville, IN 47974 | $22,394 |
11 | Hill Fam Farms LLC | Clinton, IN 47842 | $21,706 |
12 | Sfs Farm | Hillsdale, IN 47854 | $20,777 |
13 | Daniel G Rippy | Clinton, IN 47842 | $17,633 |
14 | Joseph E Lubovich | Clinton, IN 47842 | $17,323 |
15 | Strubinger Brothers LLC | Dana, IN 47847 | $15,728 |
16 | Bennie Keltz | Hillsdale, IN 47854 | $12,330 |
17 | Wealing Farms LLC | Remington, IN 47977 | $10,935 |
18 | Dean Alan Chew | Covington, IN 47932 | $10,489 |
19 | Dennis Chew | Cayuga, IN 47928 | $10,302 |
20 | E & M Farms | Clinton, IN 47842 | $9,891 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>