Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Vigo County, Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 59
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Vigo County, Indiana totaled $362,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Jeff Gormong | Farmersburg, IN 47850 | $2,545 |
22 | Phillip C Carter | Lewis, IN 47858 | $2,400 |
23 | Deborah D Carter | Lewis, IN 47858 | $2,400 |
24 | Jerome A Cerny | Terre Haute, IN 47805 | $2,045 |
25 | Rena Tucker | Joliet, IL 60435 | $1,649 |
26 | Stultz Hill Top Farms Inc | Terre Haute, IN 47805 | $1,452 |
27 | Steven R Woll | Crawfordsville, IN 47933 | $1,444 |
28 | Angela Jaynes | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $1,414 |
29 | Judy A Payne | Carmel, IN 46033 | $1,414 |
30 | Joseph H Irwin Jr | West Terre Haute, IN 47885 | $1,403 |
31 | Breanne L Perry | Spencer, IN 47460 | $1,312 |
32 | Alyssa A Perry Trust | Danville, IL 61834 | $1,302 |
33 | Kelsey E Martin Trust | Danville, IL 61834 | $1,302 |
34 | Molly Kathryn Martin Trust | Spencer, IN 47460 | $1,302 |
35 | Jacqueline Liliane Loeb | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $1,146 |
36 | Opal Clark | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $981 |
37 | Herbert Clark Jr Estate | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $981 |
38 | Deborah K Selvia | Naples, FL 34119 | $871 |
39 | William & Elizabeth Miller Trust For Lynda Clark R | Terre Haute, IN 47808 | $819 |
40 | Leonard Stultz | Terre Haute, IN 47805 | $726 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”