Total Commodity Programs in Whitley County, Indiana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 397
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Whitley County, Indiana totaled $3,165,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Thomas Henney | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $22,515 |
42 | Brent Drew | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $22,412 |
43 | Zumbrun Bros | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $22,313 |
44 | Daryl Sheiss | Larwill, IN 46764 | $22,137 |
45 | Brad Ferrell | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $21,983 |
46 | Stanley Studebaker | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $21,561 |
47 | Hindbaugh L L C | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $20,964 |
48 | James T Cormany | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $20,875 |
49 | Cynthia Sue Cormany | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $20,875 |
50 | Walter Trabert Sr | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $20,699 |
51 | Seth A Schrader | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $20,381 |
52 | James A Pettigrew | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $19,206 |
53 | Wolf Brothers % Ken Wolf | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $19,108 |
54 | Tagtmeyer Family Limited Partnership | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $18,379 |
55 | Kent Richards | North Manchester, IN 46962 | $18,298 |
56 | Stanley Sickafoose | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $17,655 |
57 | Ayers Family Farms LLC | Roanoke, IN 46783 | $17,238 |
58 | Jenny L Pettigrew | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $16,456 |
59 | Larry E Ashbaugh | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $16,081 |
60 | Randall K Studebaker | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $16,048 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”