Total Commodity Programs in Whitley County, Indiana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 397
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Whitley County, Indiana totaled $3,165,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Richard Cox | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $34,894 |
22 | J B Sons | Churubusco, IN 46723 | $31,440 |
23 | Wayne C Lauer | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $31,272 |
24 | Juillerat Farms Incorporated | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $30,357 |
25 | Peter Rouch | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $29,567 |
26 | Max E Michel | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $29,477 |
27 | Kenneth L Laux | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $29,422 |
28 | Chris Long | Pierceton, IN 46562 | $28,749 |
29 | Molly Long | Pierceton, IN 46562 | $28,749 |
30 | Douglas L Schrader | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $28,385 |
31 | Johnson Riverbend Farms Inc | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $28,333 |
32 | Jennifer L Rice | Huntington, IN 46750 | $27,294 |
33 | Barnett Family Farms LLC | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $26,578 |
34 | More Family Farms Inc | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $26,408 |
35 | Dean Wendel Farms Inc | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $25,312 |
36 | Robert Wendel Farms Inc | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $24,872 |
37 | Mary Wendel Farms Inc | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $24,850 |
38 | Walter Trabert Jr | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $23,963 |
39 | Harold Copp Farms Inc | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $23,457 |
40 | Thomas E Western | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $22,744 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”