Counter Cyclical Program in Buena Vista County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,339
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Buena Vista County, Iowa totaled $12,671,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Demers Farms | Rembrandt, IA 50576 | $143,328 |
2 | Neil Lavern Quirin | Alta, IA 51002 | $130,000 |
3 | Richard Carl Lorenzen | Linn Grove, IA 51033 | $94,179 |
4 | Franzmeier Farms Corp | Storm Lake, IA 50588 | $84,312 |
5 | Turnquist Farm Account | Alta, IA 51002 | $77,435 |
6 | Ehlers Farms Ltd | Newell, IA 50568 | $73,557 |
7 | Bloom Farms | Albert City, IA 50510 | $73,124 |
8 | Michael Franzmeier | Rembrandt, IA 50576 | $68,658 |
9 | S & S Farms Inc | Storm Lake, IA 50588 | $62,399 |
10 | Bruce Edward Engelmann | Storm Lake, IA 50588 | $57,600 |
11 | Tracy Bengtson | Alta, IA 51002 | $55,479 |
12 | James F Renze | Carroll, IA 51401 | $54,235 |
13 | Ricky Allen Johnson | Newell, IA 50568 | $53,167 |
14 | Mark Erich Halverson | Linn Grove, IA 51033 | $53,113 |
15 | Siepker Farm Inc | Albert City, IA 50510 | $51,579 |
16 | Guy Randall Mckibben | Rembrandt, IA 50576 | $50,534 |
17 | Brian Dale Madsen | Rembrandt, IA 50576 | $50,326 |
18 | Sievers Brothers Ptrshp | Albert City, IA 50510 | $49,440 |
19 | Duane P Magnussen | Newell, IA 50568 | $49,372 |
20 | Dennis Mark Halverson | Sioux Rapids, IA 50585 | $49,049 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>