Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Chickasaw County, Iowa, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 190
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Chickasaw County, Iowa totaled $507,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Bcs Farm Partnership | Fredericksburg, IA 50630 | $28,461 |
2 | Donna M Smith Rev Trust | Elma, IA 50628 | $25,528 |
3 | Tessa Reicks | Lawler, IA 52154 | $21,996 |
4 | Gilbert Farms Corp | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $18,452 |
5 | Jennifer L Woodring | Fredericksburg, IA 50630 | $16,884 |
6 | Karen Virginia Lantow | Fredericksburg, IA 50630 | $15,618 |
7 | Karnik Leifker LLC | Blaine, MN 55449 | $11,847 |
8 | Connie Sue Edson | Ionia, IA 50645 | $11,174 |
9 | Lk Farms LLC | Fredericksburg, IA 50630 | $11,054 |
10 | Nathan Webster Underwood | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $10,784 |
11 | Kim Marie Nolte | Fredericksburg, IA 50630 | $9,682 |
12 | D & D Farms Inc | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $9,583 |
13 | Kimberly Jo Blazek | Lawler, IA 52154 | $8,621 |
14 | Cory Kuehn | Ionia, IA 50645 | $8,226 |
15 | Griffin Poppe | Nashua, IA 50658 | $8,226 |
16 | Carolyn Marie Nelson | Ionia, IA 50645 | $8,181 |
17 | Breitbach Farms Inc | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $8,098 |
18 | Comeback Farms Inc | Fredericksburg, IA 50630 | $8,042 |
19 | Jean Marie Leichtman | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $7,878 |
20 | Kirk Thomas Lynch | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $7,565 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>