Loan Deficiency in Des Moines County, Iowa, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 993
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Des Moines County, Iowa totaled $23,611,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Seymour Farms Ltd | Danville, IA 52623 | $152,980 |
| 22 | Kelly Baker Inc | Mount Pleasant, IA 52641 | $152,535 |
| 23 | Ray Robertson | Mediapolis, IA 52637 | $152,310 |
| 24 | Consolidated Properties Inc | Mount Vernon, IA 52314 | $151,463 |
| 25 | Licko Inc | Mediapolis, IA 52637 | $146,720 |
| 26 | Mgm Farms Inc | Mediapolis, IA 52637 | $134,090 |
| 27 | Dan Keitzer Ltd | Mediapolis, IA 52637 | $130,426 |
| 28 | Radell Robertson | Palo, IA 52324 | $129,210 |
| 29 | Randy Meeker | Burlington, IA 52601 | $127,698 |
| 30 | T & C Farms Inc | Mount Union, IA 52644 | $126,755 |
| 31 | Larry Beck | Danville, IA 52623 | $125,795 |
| 32 | Ramarr Robertson | Mediapolis, IA 52637 | $125,034 |
| 33 | Stewart Farms Inc | Burlington, IA 52601 | $123,589 |
| 34 | Tall Farms Inc | Mount Union, IA 52644 | $123,424 |
| 35 | Michael C Kennedy | Yarmouth, IA 52660 | $122,954 |
| 36 | Ervin Baker | Burlington, IA 52601 | $121,155 |
| 37 | Dennis R Miller | Burlington, IA 52601 | $119,479 |
| 38 | Steve Shumaker | Danville, IA 52623 | $118,609 |
| 39 | Brian J Wiegand | Oakville, IA 52646 | $116,819 |
| 40 | Henry H Myers | Mediapolis, IA 52637 | $116,405 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf