Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Emmet County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 131
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Emmet County, Iowa totaled $2,871,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Luke Farm Corporation | Graettinger, IA 51342 | $39,226 |
22 | Joe Greig | Estherville, IA 51334 | $35,821 |
23 | Ronald Frank Klingbeil | Estherville, IA 51334 | $35,764 |
24 | Lance White | Estherville, IA 51334 | $35,705 |
25 | Mcconnell Partnership | Armstrong, IA 50514 | $32,626 |
26 | Glen E Olson Rev Trust | Ringsted, IA 50578 | $32,273 |
27 | Kenneth L Devore | Terril, IA 51364 | $31,479 |
28 | Brent Lewis Hopp | Estherville, IA 51334 | $30,459 |
29 | Rosburg Farm Inc | Estherville, IA 51334 | $29,892 |
30 | Alvin Charles Luke | Graettinger, IA 51342 | $29,355 |
31 | Paul R Smith | Estherville, IA 51334 | $29,150 |
32 | Ag-way Inc | Okoboji, IA 51355 | $28,996 |
33 | David Berge Boe | Estherville, IA 51334 | $28,818 |
34 | Douglas Allen Evans | Terril, IA 51364 | $27,131 |
35 | Alice Marie Olson | Ringsted, IA 50578 | $26,973 |
36 | Donald Harry Jensen | Ringsted, IA 50578 | $26,454 |
37 | Delbert Dwayne Luke | Ringsted, IA 50578 | $26,146 |
38 | Glenn W Howard | Dolliver, IA 50531 | $25,921 |
39 | Douglas E Rock | Swea City, IA 50590 | $24,868 |
40 | David J Rock | Swea City, IA 50590 | $24,868 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”