Farm Subsidy information
Floyd County, Iowa
Total Subsidies in Floyd County, Iowa, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,294
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Floyd County, Iowa totaled $19,456,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Thomas J Staudt | Dougherty, IA 50433 | $45,193 |
42 | Lorrie L Staudt | Dougherty, IA 50433 | $45,193 |
43 | Larry Dean Bortz | Rudd, IA 50471 | $45,059 |
44 | Dean Tjaden | Charles City, IA 50616 | $45,049 |
45 | Raymond Eugene Holzer | Charles City, IA 50616 | $44,856 |
46 | Steven L Shankland | Charles City, IA 50616 | $44,527 |
47 | Double Tt Farms Inc | Marble Rock, IA 50653 | $44,401 |
48 | Fox Family Farms Inc | Charles City, IA 50616 | $44,293 |
49 | Charles Edward Knapp | Charles City, IA 50616 | $44,189 |
50 | Deanne Kay Knapp | Charles City, IA 50616 | $44,188 |
51 | Howe Farms Inc | Nora Springs, IA 50458 | $43,999 |
52 | Zastrow Inc | Mason City, IA 50401 | $43,555 |
53 | Ronald Dean Stewart | Charles City, IA 50616 | $42,801 |
54 | Shadow Mead Farm LLC | Charles City, IA 50616 | $42,790 |
55 | Gordon J Boge | Charles City, IA 50616 | $42,577 |
56 | Nelson L Stauffer | Charles City, IA 50616 | $41,505 |
57 | Boyd Alan Campbell | Rudd, IA 50471 | $40,926 |
58 | Ram Lar Fms Inc | Rockford, IA 50468 | $40,899 |
59 | P & G Farms Inc | Rockford, IA 50468 | $40,690 |
60 | Guy Frank Lines Jr | Nashua, IA 50658 | $40,179 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”