Conservation Reserve Program in Floyd County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 2,247
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Floyd County, Iowa totaled $87,800,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Robert A Kreider | Rapid City, SD 57701 | $241,777 |
62 | Louis A Blickenderfer | Charles City, IA 50616 | $241,384 |
63 | Schmitt Bros Ptn | Marble Rock, IA 50653 | $237,494 |
64 | Melanie M Muth | Waukee, IA 50263 | $236,499 |
65 | Rodney L Hinz | Charles City, IA 50616 | $235,131 |
66 | James A Gambaiani | Charles City, IA 50616 | $231,104 |
67 | Randall J Gilbert | Floyd, IA 50435 | $229,014 |
68 | Randy R Brunner | Charles City, IA 50616 | $227,771 |
69 | Anthony Alan Wood | Rudd, IA 50471 | $227,430 |
70 | Tammy Steinwandt | Waukee, IA 50263 | $225,539 |
71 | Clifford R Kelly | Charles City, IA 50616 | $224,005 |
72 | Charles E Pyatt | Charles City, IA 50616 | $223,112 |
73 | Rita M Zimmer Trust | Floyd, IA 50435 | $222,636 |
74 | Cleo Hebert Trust | Charles City, IA 50616 | $222,200 |
75 | J Duane Hebert Residuary Trust | Charles City, IA 50616 | $222,197 |
76 | Gerald W Wells | Mason City, IA 50401 | $221,171 |
77 | Dennis M Tack | Hollister, MO 65673 | $220,588 |
78 | T Edw Batty Farms Inc | Rockford, IA 50468 | $220,480 |
79 | Robert E Paulus | Rockford, IA 50468 | $220,321 |
80 | Ann L Ott-schneckloth | Charles City, IA 50616 | $217,461 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”