Conservation Reserve Program in Floyd County, Iowa, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 2,058
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Floyd County, Iowa totaled $75,126,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Guy Frank Lines Jr | Nashua, IA 50658 | $344,090 |
22 | Scott A Heinz | Charles City, IA 50616 | $332,656 |
23 | David W Underwood | Clear Lake, IA 50428 | $329,117 |
24 | Elmer Buchholz Jr | Charles City, IA 50616 | $324,468 |
25 | Hoeft Enterprises LLC | Charles City, IA 50616 | $321,075 |
26 | Lyle W Schmitt | Waterloo, IA 50701 | $318,499 |
27 | Randall Van Lines | Marble Rock, IA 50653 | $316,478 |
28 | Mary E Weitzel Trust | Mason City, IA 50401 | $298,024 |
29 | Roger W Burnett | Rockford, IA 50468 | $295,033 |
30 | Dean Henry Holzer | Charles City, IA 50616 | $294,771 |
31 | Charles E Henely | Charles City, IA 50616 | $289,752 |
32 | James Claire Muller | Rudd, IA 50471 | $284,795 |
33 | H E Trettin Inc | Rockford, IA 50468 | $276,701 |
34 | Jim J Zbornik | Charles City, IA 50616 | $274,628 |
35 | Wallace William Schilling | Charles City, IA 50616 | $270,145 |
36 | Donald P Nelson | Rockford, IA 50468 | $267,539 |
37 | Maurice M Johnson | Floyd, IA 50435 | $266,421 |
38 | Jerome Carl Jensen | Greene, IA 50636 | $265,700 |
39 | Rottinghaus Farms Inc | Charles City, IA 50616 | $261,902 |
40 | Donald J Thorson | Charles City, IA 50616 | $258,446 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”