Conservation Reserve Program in Floyd County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 2,247
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Floyd County, Iowa totaled $87,800,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Shanks Farm Corp | Spicewood, TX 78669 | $392,349 |
22 | Lyle W Schmitt | Waterloo, IA 50701 | $383,845 |
23 | Terry Dean Wegner | Charles City, IA 50616 | $380,542 |
24 | David W Underwood | Clear Lake, IA 50428 | $379,210 |
25 | Randall Van Lines | Marble Rock, IA 50653 | $369,756 |
26 | Dean Henry Holzer | Charles City, IA 50616 | $361,957 |
27 | Hoeft Enterprises LLC | Charles City, IA 50616 | $356,347 |
28 | Elmer Buchholz Jr | Charles City, IA 50616 | $353,722 |
29 | Raymond Eugene Holzer | Charles City, IA 50616 | $341,150 |
30 | Roger W Burnett | Rockford, IA 50468 | $336,147 |
31 | Mary E Weitzel Trust | Mason City, IA 50401 | $329,664 |
32 | James Claire Muller | Rudd, IA 50471 | $315,407 |
33 | Maurice M Johnson | Floyd, IA 50435 | $314,465 |
34 | Douglas K Moser | Rockford, IA 50468 | $309,257 |
35 | A & J Farms Inc | Charles City, IA 50616 | $308,027 |
36 | Wallace William Schilling | Charles City, IA 50616 | $304,370 |
37 | H E Trettin Inc | Rockford, IA 50468 | $298,021 |
38 | Rottinghaus Farms Inc | Charles City, IA 50616 | $296,378 |
39 | Jerome Carl Jensen | Greene, IA 50636 | $295,738 |
40 | Little Cedar Farms LLC | Pella, IA 50219 | $295,466 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”