Production Flexibility Program in Hamilton County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,775
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Hamilton County, Iowa totaled $45,353,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Robert L Keane | Williams, IA 50271 | $175,890 |
22 | Hill Bros Fm | Webster City, IA 50595 | $169,116 |
23 | Roger Tapper Farms Inc | Dallas Center, IA 50063 | $168,517 |
24 | James Alvin Walker | Webster City, IA 50595 | $165,175 |
25 | Doolittle Farms Ltd | Webster City, IA 50595 | $162,181 |
26 | Donald Hill | Sister Bay, WI 54234 | $161,227 |
27 | Hawkeye Hogs Inc | Story City, IA 50248 | $160,960 |
28 | Wurch Farm Inc | Webster City, IA 50595 | $160,581 |
29 | Keith R Bowden | Alden, IA 50006 | $156,984 |
30 | Eric Doolittle | Williams, IA 50271 | $156,489 |
31 | Allen Anderson | Williams, IA 50271 | $155,667 |
32 | Arnold Lee Odland | Webster City, IA 50595 | $153,373 |
33 | Carroll D Ose | Blairsburg, IA 50034 | $152,509 |
34 | Gordon Farms Inc | Webster City, IA 50595 | $152,438 |
35 | James Phillip Juon | Stanhope, IA 50246 | $150,671 |
36 | Elkin Farms Inc | Webster City, IA 50595 | $148,046 |
37 | Ramms Farm Inc | Ellsworth, IA 50075 | $147,910 |
38 | Schwarz Farm Corp | Wauwatosa, WI 53226 | $146,376 |
39 | Joan E Stark Revocable Trust | Fort Dodge, IA 50501 | $139,735 |
40 | Gordon Quam | Boone, IA 50036 | $139,045 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”