Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Henry County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 95
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Henry County, Iowa totaled $44,107 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Sam Collora | Mount Pleasant, IA 52641 | $13,056 |
2 | Daniel Joseph Pidgeon | Salem, IA 52649 | $2,183 |
3 | Mns Family Farms LLC | Salem, IA 52649 | $1,684 |
4 | Merlin Burden | New London, IA 52645 | $1,538 |
5 | Jason J Denning | Mount Pleasant, IA 52641 | $1,393 |
6 | Amc Farms Inc | Wayland, IA 52654 | $1,338 |
7 | Ledru Merlin Freyenberger | Wayland, IA 52654 | $1,100 |
8 | Baylor Farms Lc | Mount Pleasant, IA 52641 | $1,070 |
9 | Meyer Farms Inc | Wayland, IA 52654 | $865 |
10 | Just Holler Ltd | Mount Pleasant, IA 52641 | $772 |
11 | Michael Todd Moothart | Lockridge, IA 52635 | $768 |
12 | Joseph John Miller | Crawfordsville, IA 52621 | $687 |
13 | Marcus Allen Moothart | Lockridge, IA 52635 | $682 |
14 | Thomas Heidt | Lockridge, IA 52635 | $666 |
15 | Kenneth M Campbell | Mount Pleasant, IA 52641 | $651 |
16 | Jason Robert Campbell | Mt Pleasant, IA 52641 | $651 |
17 | Gary Albert Witte | Mount Pleasant, IA 52641 | $588 |
18 | Thom M Miller | Winfield, IA 52659 | $507 |
19 | Mg Cattle Inc | Salem, IA 52649 | $496 |
20 | Craig Nelson | New London, IA 52645 | $485 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>