Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Howard County, Iowa, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 54
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Howard County, Iowa totaled $113,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | William Eugene Mahr | Lime Springs, IA 52155 | $17,485 |
2 | Curtis Patrick Head | Lime Springs, IA 52155 | $9,663 |
3 | Kenneth Michael Marr | Riceville, IA 50466 | $7,043 |
4 | Stephen Michael Mahr | Cresco, IA 52136 | $4,588 |
5 | Sharon A Sobolik | Cresco, IA 52136 | $4,332 |
6 | Brandon James Reis | Lime Springs, IA 52155 | $4,182 |
7 | Marshall Stanley Dvorak | Riceville, IA 50466 | $3,886 |
8 | Randy John Swestka | Cresco, IA 52136 | $3,479 |
9 | Andrew Joseph Friedges | Cresco, IA 52136 | $3,430 |
10 | Phyllis J Larson | Chester, IA 52134 | $3,419 |
11 | , | $3,004 | |
12 | Eps Farms, LLC | Riceville, IA 50466 | $2,761 |
13 | Christopher J Brincks | Elma, IA 50628 | $2,738 |
14 | Kent Michael Ries | Elma, IA 50628 | $2,580 |
15 | Joseph William Dietzenbach | Cresco, IA 52136 | $2,566 |
16 | Lyle James Eastman | Riceville, IA 50466 | $2,238 |
17 | Sharon Kay Watt | Cresco, IA 52136 | $2,125 |
18 | Samuel P Ollendieck | Lime Springs, IA 52155 | $1,822 |
19 | Robert Michael Flugge | Nora Springs, IA 50458 | $1,715 |
20 | Craig Andrew Christensen | Osage, IA 50461 | $1,693 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>