Production Flexibility Program in Howard County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,154
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Howard County, Iowa totaled $28,528,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | D R S G Partnership | Cresco, IA 52136 | $405,520 |
2 | Dvorak Brothers | Riceville, IA 50466 | $403,200 |
3 | Sovereigns Inc | Cresco, IA 52136 | $249,402 |
4 | Michael Joseph Fox | Riceville, IA 50466 | $209,271 |
5 | Gerald Joseph Dvorak | Decorah, IA 52101 | $192,480 |
6 | Max Sylvester Schmidt | Elma, IA 50628 | $182,143 |
7 | David William Daley | Cresco, IA 52136 | $177,899 |
8 | R J And Company | Lime Springs, IA 52155 | $176,076 |
9 | Charles Gary Lichty | La Porte City, IA 50651 | $175,058 |
10 | Randall William Smith | Cresco, IA 52136 | $168,283 |
11 | Richter Inc | Lime Springs, IA 52155 | $167,787 |
12 | Pine Creek Farm Ltd | Lime Springs, IA 52155 | $165,421 |
13 | Michael Dale Lewis | Chester, IA 52134 | $165,270 |
14 | D & H Stark Farms Ltd | Riceville, IA 50466 | $162,634 |
15 | Georgia Anne Schmidt | Elma, IA 50628 | $161,522 |
16 | Donna M Smith Rev Trust | Elma, IA 50628 | $158,947 |
17 | Teddy Ray Hjelmeland | Saint Ansgar, IA 50472 | $156,444 |
18 | Neubauer Farms Inc | Lime Springs, IA 52155 | $154,550 |
19 | Triple R Farm Ltd | Lime Springs, IA 52155 | $152,508 |
20 | Ollendick Farms Inc | Lime Springs, IA 52155 | $152,374 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>