Farm Subsidy information
Keokuk County, Iowa
Total Subsidies in Keokuk County, Iowa, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 3,518
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Keokuk County, Iowa totaled $478,598,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lee & Sons | Webster, IA 52355 | $2,589,827 |
| 2 | D & D Horras Farms Ptn | Brighton, IA 52540 | $2,147,407 |
| 3 | Calvin Knowler | Sigourney, IA 52591 | $2,020,305 |
| 4 | Donald Herr Sr | Sigourney, IA 52591 | $1,949,209 |
| 5 | Sieren Family Farms Inc | Keota, IA 52248 | $1,902,985 |
| 6 | Mather Farms Inc | Webster, IA 52355 | $1,868,502 |
| 7 | Snakenberg Bros | Harper, IA 52231 | $1,842,662 |
| 8 | Kwkf LLC | Keota, IA 52248 | $1,833,349 |
| 9 | John Gent | Webster, IA 52355 | $1,809,273 |
| 10 | Valley View Ranch Co | Keota, IA 52248 | $1,772,322 |
| 11 | Berg Pork Ltd | Keota, IA 52248 | $1,756,492 |
| 12 | Donald D Herr Jr | Sigourney, IA 52591 | $1,677,774 |
| 13 | Harvey Kuntz & Sons | Rose Hill, IA 52586 | $1,582,588 |
| 14 | Bouslog Brothers Farm Partnership | South English, IA 52335 | $1,578,295 |
| 15 | J Anthony Weber | Washington, IA 52353 | $1,531,023 |
| 16 | John Molyneux | What Cheer, IA 50268 | $1,455,093 |
| 17 | A & D Farms Inc | Keota, IA 52248 | $1,406,125 |
| 18 | Sandy Land Ltd | Wellman, IA 52356 | $1,384,518 |
| 19 | Dennis Hiemstra | Delta, IA 52550 | $1,350,041 |
| 20 | D C Hammes Farms Inc | Ollie, IA 52576 | $1,343,815 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf