Farm Subsidy information
Kossuth County, Iowa
Total Subsidies in Kossuth County, Iowa, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 5,524
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Kossuth County, Iowa totaled $847,824,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Mark Ferstl | Algona, IA 50511 | $1,549,361 |
22 | Warren Lynn Waltman | Algona, IA 50511 | $1,513,730 |
23 | Kenneth Michael Laubenthal | Bancroft, IA 50517 | $1,476,376 |
24 | Rodney Bierle | Fenton, IA 50539 | $1,470,664 |
25 | Antoine Acres Inc | Bancroft, IA 50517 | $1,433,878 |
26 | J-shar Inc | Burt, IA 50522 | $1,432,750 |
27 | Sjmc Corp | Lakota, IA 50451 | $1,426,325 |
28 | Beam Grain Co | Lakota, IA 50451 | $1,414,630 |
29 | Dick Kuecker & Sons | Whittemore, IA 50598 | $1,414,302 |
30 | Paul Edward Bormann | Bancroft, IA 50517 | $1,399,397 |
31 | Michael L Kohlhaas | West Bend, IA 50597 | $1,381,647 |
32 | Rock N Sons Inc | Swea City, IA 50590 | $1,380,470 |
33 | Harna Farms Inc | Blue Earth, MN 56013 | $1,349,834 |
34 | Murl Dean Dodds | Algona, IA 50511 | $1,346,958 |
35 | Howard Frideres Farms Inc | Algona, IA 50511 | $1,313,581 |
36 | C & J Farm Partnership | Swea City, IA 50590 | $1,302,415 |
37 | Lennon Brandt Ent Inc | Swea City, IA 50590 | $1,284,307 |
38 | Banwart Dairy Inc | West Bend, IA 50597 | $1,280,324 |
39 | Marks Vi Inc | Corwith, IA 50430 | $1,277,617 |
40 | Kent Rode | Titonka, IA 50480 | $1,270,678 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”