Market Loss Assistance Program in Mahaska County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,523
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Mahaska County, Iowa totaled $16,925,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Wayne De Bruin | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $63,030 |
22 | Richard L Hugen | Pella, IA 50219 | $62,303 |
23 | Elmer Van Donselaar | Rose Hill, IA 52586 | $61,751 |
24 | Rvd Farms Inc | Cedar, IA 52543 | $60,666 |
25 | Pierson Farms Inc | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $59,888 |
26 | Bogaards Farms Inc | Pella, IA 50219 | $59,821 |
27 | C John Crill | Rose Hill, IA 52586 | $59,181 |
28 | Donald & Bonnie Vos Family Trust | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $58,860 |
29 | Calvin Branderhorst | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $58,619 |
30 | Tri-mac Inc | Cedar, IA 52543 | $56,767 |
31 | Ryken Farms Inc | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $56,299 |
32 | De Jong Brothers | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $55,996 |
33 | Graneva Inc | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $55,342 |
34 | Van Zante Inc | Pella, IA 50219 | $53,851 |
35 | Henry L Vande Voort | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $52,690 |
36 | Larry Ancell | Leighton, IA 50143 | $52,042 |
37 | James Irvin Scott | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $50,339 |
38 | Don Ag Limited | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $50,227 |
39 | Gvm Farms Inc | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $49,032 |
40 | Teddy Loyd Winegardner | Lexington, SC 29072 | $49,024 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”