Farm Subsidy information
Mahaska County, Iowa
Total Subsidies in Mahaska County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 3,735
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Mahaska County, Iowa totaled $459,298,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Richard L Hugen | Pella, IA 50219 | $904,934 |
42 | Randall Brostrom-rev Tr | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $881,145 |
43 | Gvm Farms Inc | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $875,323 |
44 | Van Zante Inc | Pella, IA 50219 | $868,287 |
45 | Tri-mac Inc | Cedar, IA 52543 | $846,377 |
46 | Duane Harlan Eveland | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $833,403 |
47 | Nunnikhoven Farms Inc | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $832,366 |
48 | John Rupert Ferguson | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $825,968 |
49 | Edwin Veldhuizen | Cedar, IA 52543 | $822,731 |
50 | Elmer Van Donselaar | Rose Hill, IA 52586 | $822,144 |
51 | Raymond J Vos Rev Tr | Pella, IA 50219 | $822,109 |
52 | Mc Farms Inc | What Cheer, IA 50268 | $813,125 |
53 | Elmer Wesley Roorda | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $812,217 |
54 | Ivan Eugene Vos | Leighton, IA 50143 | $811,302 |
55 | Dennis J Brown | Cedar, IA 52543 | $786,145 |
56 | William Earl Hynick | Eddyville, IA 52553 | $781,063 |
57 | Virgil Dwayne Terpstra | Pella, IA 50219 | $776,675 |
58 | Rsd Farms Inc | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $775,017 |
59 | Bogaards Farms Inc | Pella, IA 50219 | $771,950 |
60 | Antolik Inc | Eddyville, IA 52553 | $753,465 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”