Conservation Reserve Program in Mahaska County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,831
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Mahaska County, Iowa totaled $112,308,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | S & B Joint Venture | Houston, TX 77027 | $493,614 |
22 | Ronald L Meinders | Rose Hill, IA 52586 | $482,923 |
23 | Robert Van Weelden | New Sharon, IA 50207 | $466,288 |
24 | Andrew Jansen | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $465,179 |
25 | Harley Ver Meer | Pella, IA 50219 | $460,315 |
26 | Robert Van Gilst | Fremont, IA 52561 | $459,383 |
27 | Chamra Farms Inc | Rose Hill, IA 52586 | $458,390 |
28 | Kelley J Donham | Iowa City, IA 52240 | $440,778 |
29 | Henry L Van Arkel | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $438,023 |
30 | Logan Kuiper | Los Alamos, NM 87544 | $436,893 |
31 | Allied Gas & Chemical | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $435,489 |
32 | J D Fleener Estate | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $435,294 |
33 | Richard C Hoy Trust | Knoxville, IA 50138 | $434,961 |
34 | Mark Dunkin | Bussey, IA 50044 | $430,262 |
35 | Linda Kraber | Eddyville, IA 52553 | $428,308 |
36 | M E Molyneux & Sons Inc | Rose Hill, IA 52586 | $421,451 |
37 | Calvin Branderhorst | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $420,725 |
38 | Gregory A Gordy | Oskaloosa, IA 52577 | $397,966 |
39 | Vos Family South Farm Ptnsp | Ireton, IA 51027 | $389,104 |
40 | Russell J Hammes | Rose Hill, IA 52586 | $384,407 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”