Farm Subsidy information
Palo Alto County, Iowa
Total Subsidies in Palo Alto County, Iowa, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,185
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Palo Alto County, Iowa totaled $20,638,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Clear Creek Acres LLC | West Bend, IA 50597 | $366,163 |
2 | Dejay Farms | Ruthven, IA 51358 | $247,640 |
3 | Ronald & Suzanne Rouse | Curlew, IA 50527 | $109,508 |
4 | Sac & Fox Tribe Of The Mississippi In Iowa | Ames, IA 50010 | $102,039 |
5 | Wirtz Brothers | Whittemore, IA 50598 | $93,694 |
6 | Kyle D Hurley | Curlew, IA 50527 | $86,316 |
7 | Tall Cotton Partnership | Whittemore, IA 50598 | $85,582 |
8 | Curtis D Berkland | Ruthven, IA 51358 | $73,468 |
9 | Duane And Nathan Meyer Joint Venture | Ruthven, IA 51358 | $70,567 |
10 | Gary L Garrelts | Ayrshire, IA 50515 | $68,712 |
11 | Steven J Reding | Cylinder, IA 50528 | $67,927 |
12 | Mersch Farms Inc | Bellingham, WA 98228 | $67,921 |
13 | Gregg A Garrelts | Ruthven, IA 51358 | $67,605 |
14 | Wagner Construction Inc | West Bend, IA 50597 | $64,543 |
15 | Luann J Opheim | Emmetsburg, IA 50536 | $63,731 |
16 | Kassel Farms Inc | Emmetsburg, IA 50536 | $61,703 |
17 | Great Oak Farms Inc | Emmetsburg, IA 50536 | $61,703 |
18 | Lacey J Rouse | Emmetsburg, IA 50536 | $58,347 |
19 | Joyce Family Farms Inc | Graettinger, IA 51342 | $57,624 |
20 | Diane L Smith | Graettinger, IA 51342 | $56,623 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>