Farm Subsidy information
Plymouth County, Iowa
Total Subsidies in Plymouth County, Iowa, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 4,319
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Plymouth County, Iowa totaled $631,755,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Paul Langel | Le Mars, IA 51031 | $1,368,278 |
22 | David Howe | Hinton, IA 51024 | $1,344,202 |
23 | Dnp Farm Inc | Le Mars, IA 51031 | $1,337,530 |
24 | Seuntjens Farms | Kingsley, IA 51028 | $1,332,791 |
25 | Del J Kellen - Del J Kellen And Lori J Kellen Livi | Le Mars, IA 51031 | $1,314,941 |
26 | Adam Schroeder | Le Mars, IA 51031 | $1,304,273 |
27 | Gilbert Winter | Le Mars, IA 51031 | $1,275,927 |
28 | Shelly Krieg Inc | Kingsley, IA 51028 | $1,271,896 |
29 | Blane Smith | Westfield, IA 51062 | $1,264,997 |
30 | Dennis J Smith | Akron, IA 51001 | $1,256,296 |
31 | Lance Bollmeyer | Hinton, IA 51024 | $1,241,532 |
32 | Kevin De Rocher | Akron, IA 51001 | $1,236,097 |
33 | William Richard Langel | Kingsley, IA 51028 | $1,210,418 |
34 | Grayling Willer | Akron, IA 51001 | $1,186,387 |
35 | Chris Krieg | Kingsley, IA 51028 | $1,170,026 |
36 | Steve Langel | Le Mars, IA 51031 | $1,165,889 |
37 | Hillcrest Pork LLC | Kingsley, IA 51028 | $1,158,958 |
38 | 7-s Inc | Remsen, IA 51050 | $1,155,522 |
39 | Todd Sitzmann | Merrill, IA 51038 | $1,148,664 |
40 | Beitelspacher Bros | Le Mars, IA 51031 | $1,143,883 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”