Wool and Mohair Programs in Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,312
Recipients of Wool and Mohair Programs from farms in Kansas totaled $1,359,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Wool and Mohair Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Greg Will | Newton, KS 67114 | $6,018 |
42 | Ivan Kadel | Jamestown, KS 66948 | $5,856 |
43 | Harold Singleton | Hutchinson, KS 67501 | $5,272 |
44 | James T Jerrick Trust | Belle Plaine, KS 67013 | $5,231 |
45 | Ronald Mccosh Trust No 1 | Beverly, KS 67423 | $5,229 |
46 | Dallas Hiebert | Rozel, KS 67574 | $5,222 |
47 | Robert S Bader | Neosho Falls, KS 66758 | $5,117 |
48 | David L Schmidt | Moundridge, KS 67107 | $4,993 |
49 | Double Tt Farms | Kincaid, KS 66039 | $4,820 |
50 | James Mccormick | Mount Hope, KS 67108 | $4,734 |
51 | Robert N Keller | Halstead, KS 67056 | $4,675 |
52 | Verney & Janice Voth Family Trust | Newton, KS 67114 | $4,645 |
53 | Fred W Finley | Colby, KS 67701 | $4,551 |
54 | Kent Winter | Mount Hope, KS 67108 | $4,534 |
55 | Dallas D Beck | Bushton, KS 67427 | $4,524 |
56 | Dwight O Beck | Bushton, KS 67427 | $4,524 |
57 | Jerome K Wendell | Beloit, KS 67420 | $4,452 |
58 | Elwyn L Bell | Lincoln, KS 67455 | $4,424 |
59 | Thomas L Kee | Yates Center, KS 66783 | $4,309 |
60 | Verle D Loewen | Meade, KS 67864 | $4,238 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”