Farm Subsidy information
Chase County, Kansas
Total Subsidies in Chase County, Kansas, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 258
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Chase County, Kansas totaled $3,737,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Giger Land And Cattle Corporation | Elmdale, KS 66850 | $216,996 |
2 | Palenske Ranch Inc | Strong City, KS 66869 | $171,844 |
3 | Soyez Brothers LLC | Cedar Point, KS 66843 | $147,525 |
4 | Heathman Farms LLC | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $107,415 |
5 | Steve Eidman | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $90,596 |
6 | Keith J Glanville Rev Trust | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $84,631 |
7 | Larry Soyez | Elmdale, KS 66850 | $80,347 |
8 | Eidman Farms LLC | Emporia, KS 66801 | $71,668 |
9 | Charles Pretzer | Elmdale, KS 66850 | $59,171 |
10 | John E Soyez | Cedar Point, KS 66843 | $53,800 |
11 | William Soyez | Florence, KS 66851 | $51,174 |
12 | Daniel E Nurnberg | Emporia, KS 66801 | $51,144 |
13 | Howard D Nurnberg Rev Trust | Emporia, KS 66801 | $44,720 |
14 | Doug Cahoone | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $44,208 |
15 | Larry Kohr | Elmdale, KS 66850 | $43,939 |
16 | Bar W Bar Corporation | Elmdale, KS 66850 | $43,909 |
17 | Harshman Land & Cattle LLC | Cedar Point, KS 66843 | $40,332 |
18 | Frank R Soyez | Cedar Point, KS 66843 | $40,058 |
19 | Hendrika Vos | Cedar Point, KS 66843 | $36,098 |
20 | Shawn Potts | Elmdale, KS 66850 | $34,954 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>