Loan Deficiency in Chase County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 376
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Chase County, Kansas totaled $3,407,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Palenske Ranch Inc | Strong City, KS 66869 | $215,636 |
2 | Thomas R Heathman Trust | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $189,702 |
3 | Eidman Farms LLC | Emporia, KS 66801 | $154,298 |
4 | Steve Eidman | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $145,239 |
5 | Soyez Brothers | Cedar Point, KS 66843 | $143,535 |
6 | H L Roberts | Strong City, KS 66869 | $79,210 |
7 | Charles Pretzer | Elmdale, KS 66850 | $67,862 |
8 | Alan D Giger | Elmdale, KS 66850 | $66,759 |
9 | Raymond Barrett | Emporia, KS 66801 | $64,778 |
10 | Charles Tom Jones | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $59,489 |
11 | Elmo Starkey | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $54,739 |
12 | Doug Cahoone | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $53,701 |
13 | Keith J Glanville Rev Trust | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $53,234 |
14 | Craig A Cooper | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $45,404 |
15 | Howard D Nurnberg Rev Trust | Emporia, KS 66801 | $44,918 |
16 | Wittker Farms | Strong City, KS 66869 | $43,536 |
17 | Harshman Farms Inc | Cedar Point, KS 66843 | $40,536 |
18 | Charles A Pilgrim Rev Trust | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $39,209 |
19 | Larry Soyez | Elmdale, KS 66850 | $38,067 |
20 | Gary Peterson | Cottonwood Falls, KS 66845 | $36,199 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>