Total Commodity Programs in Cherokee County, Kansas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 910
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Cherokee County, Kansas totaled $6,887,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Circle F Farms Inc | Columbus, KS 66725 | $45,647 |
42 | Saporito Farms Inc | Columbus, KS 66725 | $45,486 |
43 | Jarrett Brothers Farm Inc | Baxter Springs, KS 66713 | $45,411 |
44 | Paul Derris Simpson | Weir, KS 66781 | $45,214 |
45 | Gene Bottorff | Galena, KS 66739 | $44,979 |
46 | Steven L And Debra Rider Living Trust | Mc Cune, KS 66753 | $43,326 |
47 | Charles O'malley | Scammon, KS 66773 | $40,787 |
48 | Steven J Tanner | Columbus, KS 66725 | $40,541 |
49 | Andrew S Jarrett | Baxter Springs, KS 66713 | $36,526 |
50 | John Robert Gaither | Columbus, KS 66725 | $36,404 |
51 | David Waugh | Pittsburg, KS 66762 | $36,367 |
52 | Robert Craig Stover | Columbus, KS 66725 | $36,253 |
53 | Erick Bryce Jessee | Columbus, KS 66725 | $36,222 |
54 | Mussa Grain And Cattle Inc | Scammon, KS 66773 | $35,983 |
55 | Richard Wayne Jessee | Columbus, KS 66725 | $34,492 |
56 | Brandon Coons | Columbus, KS 66725 | $34,146 |
57 | Ronald E Westervelt | Columbus, KS 66725 | $34,067 |
58 | Ryan J Stephens | Mc Cune, KS 66753 | $34,059 |
59 | Gary Stephens | Mc Cune, KS 66753 | $33,583 |
60 | Travis Saporito | Columbus, KS 66725 | $32,739 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”