Conservation Reserve Program in Cheyenne County, Kansas, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 303
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Cheyenne County, Kansas totaled $1,335,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Kaye O'brien | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $48,509 |
2 | T & C Culwell Lp | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $47,999 |
3 | Roger R Zweygardt | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $40,269 |
4 | Clinton Schlepp | Wray, CO 80758 | $32,648 |
5 | Hansons Ag Investments Lllp | Burlington, CO 80807 | $30,103 |
6 | Hines Farms | Colby, KS 67701 | $25,119 |
7 | Mary Morrow | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $22,762 |
8 | Joan G Wellman | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $21,426 |
9 | William W Turner | Mt Juliet, TN 37122 | $17,311 |
10 | Fairview Farms Inc | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $16,511 |
11 | Six Boys LLC | Parker, CO 80134 | $16,048 |
12 | Detter Golden Acres LLC | Loveland, CO 80537 | $15,838 |
13 | Cory D Busse | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $15,618 |
14 | Daniel - D & L Busse Family Trust - P Busse | Bird City, KS 67731 | $15,324 |
15 | Betty Petersen | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $15,057 |
16 | Ron G Maifeld | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $14,925 |
17 | Hardt Family Trust | Scottsdale, AZ 85258 | $14,739 |
18 | , | $14,473 | |
19 | Smith Family Farms Partnership | Bird City, KS 67731 | $13,628 |
20 | Matthew A Schlepp | Saint Francis, KS 67756 | $12,900 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>