Farm Subsidy information
Crawford County, Kansas
Total Subsidies in Crawford County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 3,212
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Crawford County, Kansas totaled $202,090,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Parsons Farms LLC | Scammon, KS 66773 | $901,257 |
22 | Christopher Wayne Johnson | Girard, KS 66743 | $883,835 |
23 | Oplotnik Brothers | Girard, KS 66743 | $873,026 |
24 | Kenneth Murphy | Girard, KS 66743 | $850,911 |
25 | Jcb Farms Inc | Pittsburg, KS 66762 | $845,167 |
26 | Paradise Valley Farms Inc | Mc Cune, KS 66753 | $841,941 |
27 | James Huff | Mc Cune, KS 66753 | $809,457 |
28 | Keith Harris | Hepler, KS 66746 | $788,331 |
29 | Gary Renn | Pittsburg, KS 66762 | $781,293 |
30 | Circle P Farms | Scammon, KS 66773 | $721,941 |
31 | Central Prime LLC | Carl Junction, MO 64834 | $714,907 |
32 | Darren M Best | Mc Cune, KS 66753 | $712,628 |
33 | George Fauvergue | Carl Junction, MO 64834 | $712,493 |
34 | Clark Egbert | Mc Cune, KS 66753 | $687,656 |
35 | Buel Pool | Mc Cune, KS 66753 | $686,424 |
36 | Joseph H And Frances Page Rev Living Trust | Pittsburg, KS 66762 | $684,012 |
37 | Susie Segebartt | Joplin, MO 64801 | $680,095 |
38 | Jeffrey B Cleland | Arma, KS 66712 | $675,715 |
39 | Stephen Bennett | Mc Cune, KS 66753 | $674,390 |
40 | B & M Ag Inc | Pittsburg, KS 66762 | $673,975 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”