Total Conservation Programs in Ford County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,695
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Ford County, Kansas totaled $63,819,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Mike H Bartlett | Fowler, KS 67844 | $371,594 |
22 | Leroy Slattery | Dodge City, KS 67801 | $370,578 |
23 | Nicholson Ventures | Dodge City, KS 67801 | $370,102 |
24 | Vernon Agur | Dodge City, KS 67801 | $360,986 |
25 | Philip E & Verna Ochs Trust | Overland Park, KS 66221 | $353,572 |
26 | Harshberger Farms Inc | Minneola, KS 67865 | $353,312 |
27 | Austin Farms | Bucklin, KS 67834 | $351,265 |
28 | Elmer Schuette | Wright, KS 67882 | $331,243 |
29 | Glenn H Dohrmann | Ensign, KS 67841 | $316,137 |
30 | Riegel Farms Inc | Dodge City, KS 67801 | $313,641 |
31 | Vanita Mentzer | Cimarron, KS 67835 | $309,060 |
32 | Anthony Indiek | Dodge City, KS 67801 | $308,621 |
33 | Lois A Swonger | Bloom, KS 67865 | $307,352 |
34 | Jerry Hager | Ford, KS 67842 | $296,339 |
35 | Frank H Buehne Trust | Spearville, KS 67876 | $296,124 |
36 | Hillarian F Stegman | Offerle, KS 67563 | $285,005 |
37 | Richard E Maxwell | Dodge City, KS 67801 | $281,063 |
38 | Jewell A Perkins Rev Trst | Dodge City, KS 67801 | $274,699 |
39 | Eleanor K Basgall | Roeland Park, KS 66205 | $274,098 |
40 | John & Phyllis Indiek Trust | Spearville, KS 67876 | $270,708 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”