Farm Subsidy information
Greeley County, Kansas
Total Subsidies in Greeley County, Kansas, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 480
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Greeley County, Kansas totaled $26,847,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Mark Cavenee Farms Jv | Tribune, KS 67879 | $671,485 |
2 | Whirlwind Acres Partnership | Sharon Springs, KS 67758 | $579,469 |
3 | Verdell Young & Son | Tribune, KS 67879 | $446,809 |
4 | Homeland Farms | Sharon Springs, KS 67758 | $397,202 |
5 | Dixon Farms LLC | Tribune, KS 67879 | $322,365 |
6 | Oleo Ranch | Tribune, KS 67879 | $304,847 |
7 | Baber Inc | Tribune, KS 67879 | $297,763 |
8 | Night Sky Inc | Tribune, KS 67879 | $265,189 |
9 | Peter Farms | Tribune, KS 67879 | $249,249 |
10 | Kellee - Trust K Dixon | Tribune, KS 67879 | $239,108 |
11 | John Grubb Rev Tr | Tribune, KS 67879 | $224,205 |
12 | 3m Farms LLC | Tribune, KS 67879 | $221,812 |
13 | Smith Ranch Company Inc | Wallace, KS 67761 | $216,077 |
14 | J7 Dairy LLC | Plains, KS 67869 | $210,452 |
15 | Chris - Trust R Dixon | Tribune, KS 67879 | $207,979 |
16 | Red Farms Inc | Tribune, KS 67879 | $207,067 |
17 | Triple S Farms | Tribune, KS 67879 | $198,622 |
18 | R E & L Farms Inc | Tribune, KS 67879 | $196,017 |
19 | Al Lynn Farms Gp | Tribune, KS 67879 | $177,791 |
20 | Prairie Land Partnership | Tribune, KS 67879 | $157,545 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>