Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Lane County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 172
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Lane County, Kansas totaled $3,797,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Sand Creek Enterprise Inc | Utica, KS 67584 | $49,165 |
22 | Chanda Bush | Dighton, KS 67839 | $47,533 |
23 | Scott - Whitng And Lynette Whiting Rev D Whiting | Dighton, KS 67839 | $46,518 |
24 | Kevin W Brooks | Healy, KS 67850 | $42,329 |
25 | Brian W Brooks | Healy, KS 67850 | $40,018 |
26 | Brian D Leighty | Dighton, KS 67839 | $39,456 |
27 | Tory M Borell | Dighton, KS 67839 | $39,280 |
28 | Darren Roberts | Dighton, KS 67839 | $38,402 |
29 | Dennis & Debra Dowell Rev Tr | Dighton, KS 67839 | $38,232 |
30 | Terry Penka | Dighton, KS 67839 | $34,168 |
31 | Getz Land And Cattle | Gove, KS 67736 | $34,158 |
32 | Richard J. Price | Dighton, KS 67839 | $33,463 |
33 | Gary Hauschild | Dighton, KS 67839 | $33,326 |
34 | Coberly Partnership Mark S | Gove, KS 67736 | $29,823 |
35 | Stacy - H Lawrence And Angela L Rev Tr Lawrence | Dighton, KS 67839 | $28,385 |
36 | Benjamin A Cramer | Healy, KS 67850 | $27,958 |
37 | Whipple Ranch LLC | Beeler, KS 67518 | $27,492 |
38 | Lance Fulton Trust 1 | Garden City, KS 67846 | $27,423 |
39 | Philip Habiger | Dighton, KS 67839 | $26,783 |
40 | Bryan Evans | Gove, KS 67736 | $26,224 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”