Farm Subsidy information
Lane County, Kansas
Total Subsidies in Lane County, Kansas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 730
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Lane County, Kansas totaled $13,947,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Gary Shapland | Dighton, KS 67839 | $66,411 |
22 | Eugene - Shapland Living Trust Shapland | Dighton, KS 67839 | $64,187 |
23 | Walter O Herndon Family Trust | Dighton, KS 67839 | $62,634 |
24 | Benjamin A Cramer | Healy, KS 67850 | $61,367 |
25 | Tailwind Farms LLC | Gove, KS 67736 | $61,281 |
26 | Gene - Gene A And Kimee Ann Wilkens Trus Wilkens | Dighton, KS 67839 | $59,004 |
27 | Rex Whipple Rev Trust | Beeler, KS 67518 | $57,698 |
28 | Philip Habiger | Dighton, KS 67839 | $56,615 |
29 | Glenn W Coberly Trust | Gove, KS 67736 | $56,435 |
30 | Don J Hineman | Dighton, KS 67839 | $55,207 |
31 | Schmalzried Farms LLC | Dighton, KS 67839 | $55,072 |
32 | Saundra - Shapland Living Trust Sue Shapland | Dighton, KS 67839 | $53,220 |
33 | Moomaw Farms Inc | Dighton, KS 67839 | $52,190 |
34 | Corey Thomas Stephens | Dighton, KS 67839 | $52,158 |
35 | Getz Land And Cattle | Gove, KS 67736 | $51,965 |
36 | Gerald Riley | Dighton, KS 67839 | $51,759 |
37 | Security State Bank ** | Scott City, KS 67871 | $50,784 |
38 | Cynthia R Cramer | Healy, KS 67850 | $49,884 |
39 | Mark Cramer | Healy, KS 67850 | $49,818 |
40 | Mark Shapland | Dighton, KS 67839 | $49,357 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”