Farm Subsidy information

Montgomery County, Kansas

Total Subsidies in Montgomery County, Kansas, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,858

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Montgomery County, Kansas totaled $149,165,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2021
1Springer Family Foods, LLCIndependence, KS 67301$2,681,909
2Gordon FarmsIndependence, KS 67301$2,603,244
3Jerry D Friess Living TrustNeodesha, KS 66757$1,782,443
4Felts Farms LLCLiberty, KS 67351$1,682,622
5Mitchell Acres L L CLiberty, KS 67351$1,574,570
6Steven B FriessThayer, KS 66776$1,501,722
7Prairie Ridge Farms IncElk City, KS 67344$1,497,018
8Robert D JonesElk City, KS 67344$1,344,605
9Circle Valley Farms LLCElk City, KS 67344$1,300,333
10David B McmillinIndependence, KS 67301$1,289,047
11Chuck SpringerIndependence, KS 67301$1,247,216
12Wagner Farms IncLiberty, KS 67351$1,231,174
13Dave ToddHavana, KS 67347$1,219,272
14Roger D JanzenIndependence, KS 67301$1,119,558
15Linda - Linda J Friess Living Trust J Pelesky FrieNeodesha, KS 66757$1,099,368
16Reichenberger FarmsIndependence, KS 67301$1,039,912
17Michael SpringerNeodesha, KS 66757$1,007,172
18Graydon D Springer Rev TrustIndependence, KS 67301$983,818
19James E Gordon Rev TrustIndependence, KS 67301$966,225
20Robert Lee CampbellIndependence, KS 67301$960,402

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag