Total Commodity Programs in Morris County, Kansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,649
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Morris County, Kansas totaled $76,909,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Diamond T Inc | Wilsey, KS 66873 | $1,372,041 |
2 | Ecklund Family Farms Inc | Herington, KS 67449 | $1,324,785 |
3 | Oleen Bros | Dwight, KS 66849 | $1,107,668 |
4 | Biehler-ecklund Farms Inc | Herington, KS 67449 | $1,090,006 |
5 | Steven A Schild | Burdick, KS 66838 | $983,226 |
6 | Enno F Burhoop Trust | Herington, KS 67449 | $969,218 |
7 | Tiffany Cattle Co Inc | Herington, KS 67449 | $907,043 |
8 | Gary V Johnson | Dwight, KS 66849 | $847,327 |
9 | Jason Loomis | Council Grove, KS 66846 | $760,745 |
10 | D J Bacon | Council Grove, KS 66846 | $760,685 |
11 | Kickhaefer Family Farms LLC | Herington, KS 67449 | $757,255 |
12 | Tony A Carl | Wilsey, KS 66873 | $748,461 |
13 | Kevin Effland | White City, KS 66872 | $700,752 |
14 | Kevin Gant | Wilsey, KS 66873 | $649,722 |
15 | Leland Engel | White City, KS 66872 | $638,450 |
16 | Robert B Rose | Council Grove, KS 66846 | $632,957 |
17 | Gerald Thomas Rev Trust | Council Grove, KS 66846 | $618,797 |
18 | Scott B Rose | Council Grove, KS 66846 | $590,294 |
19 | Dan R Peterson - Dan R Peterson Revocable Trust | Burdick, KS 66838 | $575,891 |
20 | Cosgrove Farm Co | Council Grove, KS 66846 | $571,252 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>