Farm Subsidy information
Nemaha County, Kansas
Total Subsidies in Nemaha County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 3,200
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Nemaha County, Kansas totaled $438,520,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Kohake Dairy Fm Inc | Centralia, KS 66415 | $1,123,178 |
22 | Deters Dairy Farm LLC | Baileyville, KS 66404 | $1,120,856 |
23 | Wayne Joseph Heinen | Goff, KS 66428 | $1,102,740 |
24 | Holthaus Brothers LLC | Centralia, KS 66415 | $1,101,814 |
25 | Heinen Acres Inc | Seneca, KS 66538 | $1,058,418 |
26 | Les Baumgartner Inc | Sabetha, KS 66534 | $1,041,371 |
27 | Timothy J Burdiek | Centralia, KS 66415 | $1,035,053 |
28 | Hammes Family Farms Inc | Seneca, KS 66538 | $1,020,867 |
29 | John W Holland Jr Trust No 1 | Centralia, KS 66415 | $997,017 |
30 | Gary F Pfrang | Goff, KS 66428 | $991,631 |
31 | Krainbill Farms Inc | Bern, KS 66408 | $970,517 |
32 | Rottinghaus Holstein Fm Inc | Seneca, KS 66538 | $966,910 |
33 | Daniel Lee Heiman | Baileyville, KS 66404 | $964,610 |
34 | Eldon I Sudbeck | Seneca, KS 66538 | $950,452 |
35 | Flying H Farms LLC | Seneca, KS 66538 | $943,767 |
36 | J L B Farms Inc | Bern, KS 66408 | $943,739 |
37 | Betty K Olberding | Seneca, KS 66538 | $925,515 |
38 | Larry J Macke Rev Trust | Seneca, KS 66538 | $902,540 |
39 | Mac Farms Inc | Sabetha, KS 66534 | $861,136 |
40 | Douglas K Metzger | Seneca, KS 66538 | $838,100 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”