Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Ness County, Kansas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 610
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Ness County, Kansas totaled $4,170,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Stenzel Living Trust | Bazine, KS 67516 | $37,280 |
22 | Dennis Mcninch | Utica, KS 67584 | $37,251 |
23 | William H Mcleish | Ness City, KS 67560 | $37,054 |
24 | Cyrus LLC | Ransom, KS 67572 | $35,389 |
25 | Darrell D Brenner | Ness City, KS 67560 | $35,232 |
26 | Randall J Brenner | Ness City, KS 67560 | $35,232 |
27 | Charles W Walker | Brownell, KS 67521 | $34,368 |
28 | Dennis Maier | Bazine, KS 67516 | $31,576 |
29 | Stum Living Trust | Ness City, KS 67560 | $30,847 |
30 | Nick Stieben | Bazine, KS 67516 | $29,844 |
31 | B J Witthuhn | Ness City, KS 67560 | $29,657 |
32 | Thomas J Bernbeck | Utica, KS 67584 | $28,857 |
33 | Sekavec Farms Inc | Brownell, KS 67521 | $28,725 |
34 | Mark Kraus | Ransom, KS 67572 | $27,895 |
35 | Jrb Farms Inc | Ransom, KS 67572 | $27,209 |
36 | Reinert Farms Inc | Ness City, KS 67560 | $26,037 |
37 | Kyle Antenen-steven K & Gail A Antenen Trust | Ness City, KS 67560 | $26,011 |
38 | Bruntz Bros | Bazine, KS 67516 | $25,951 |
39 | Alex Nichepor Jr | Ness City, KS 67560 | $25,936 |
40 | Aaron S Pavlu | Ness City, KS 67560 | $25,727 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”