Total Commodity Programs in Osage County, Kansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,770
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Osage County, Kansas totaled $80,916,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | David B Davies Rev Trust | Osage City, KS 66523 | $1,634,925 |
2 | Dubois Farms Inc | Burlingame, KS 66413 | $1,583,967 |
3 | Bryan D Kemble | Carbondale, KS 66414 | $1,258,749 |
4 | Don Jones Farm Inc | Reading, KS 66868 | $1,207,797 |
5 | Rainbow Farms Inc | Carbondale, KS 66414 | $1,069,551 |
6 | Butel Farm Inc | Overbrook, KS 66524 | $1,046,982 |
7 | David W Thompson Rev Tr | Burlingame, KS 66413 | $1,006,404 |
8 | Robert Farm Inc | Osage City, KS 66523 | $948,844 |
9 | R H Farms Inc | Scranton, KS 66537 | $931,716 |
10 | Thompson Farms LLC | Osage City, KS 66523 | $915,199 |
11 | Kuykendall & Flax Farm Inc | Osage City, KS 66523 | $883,920 |
12 | Stanley J Friesen | Overbrook, KS 66524 | $812,674 |
13 | M & P Farms Inc | Carbondale, KS 66414 | $694,814 |
14 | Meyer Brothers | Osage City, KS 66523 | $682,247 |
15 | Robert W Scheid Trust | Scranton, KS 66537 | $640,080 |
16 | Art Jones & Sons LLC | Reading, KS 66868 | $638,674 |
17 | William D Lieber | Osage City, KS 66523 | $611,963 |
18 | Anderson Farms | Scranton, KS 66537 | $602,585 |
19 | Dale W Urish | Scranton, KS 66537 | $600,442 |
20 | Burkett Farms LLC | Osage City, KS 66523 | $595,332 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>