Total Commodity Programs in Rawlins County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,518
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Rawlins County, Kansas totaled $187,791,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | K & K Farms | Herndon, KS 67739 | $4,011,587 |
2 | Franklin Farms | Atwood, KS 67730 | $3,101,280 |
3 | N And A Farms | Atwood, KS 67730 | $1,686,201 |
4 | Fisher Farming | Mc Donald, KS 67745 | $1,670,072 |
5 | Hagler Farm Inc | Atwood, KS 67730 | $1,523,777 |
6 | Denny-nickelson Farms Jv | Colby, KS 67701 | $1,478,471 |
7 | Cwa Operating L P | Mc Donald, KS 67745 | $1,378,136 |
8 | Orten Inc | Bird City, KS 67731 | $1,317,557 |
9 | Sam & Jan Crouse Joint Venture | Atwood, KS 67730 | $1,307,605 |
10 | Horinek Brothers | Trenton, NE 69044 | $1,301,859 |
11 | Lankas Farms | Atwood, KS 67730 | $1,265,807 |
12 | Quad K Farms | Atwood, KS 67730 | $1,253,413 |
13 | Urban Farms And Cattle Inc | Atwood, KS 67730 | $1,210,558 |
14 | Paul Alan Hayden | Atwood, KS 67730 | $1,202,858 |
15 | Willard W Miller Jr Trust | Colby, KS 67701 | $1,185,058 |
16 | David Earl Argabright | Atwood, KS 67730 | $1,153,203 |
17 | Double R Ranch | Atwood, KS 67730 | $1,125,288 |
18 | Ricky L Nemeth | Ludell, KS 67744 | $1,101,729 |
19 | John E Skolout | Atwood, KS 67730 | $1,089,030 |
20 | Frisbie Wht & Hereford Farms | Mc Donald, KS 67745 | $1,051,297 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>