Conservation Reserve Program in Republic County, Kansas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 136
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Republic County, Kansas totaled $284,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Charley Novak | Narka, KS 66960 | $3,886 |
22 | Donald D Baxa Family Trust | Cuba, KS 66940 | $3,518 |
23 | Rose Creek LLC | Holland, MI 49424 | $3,438 |
24 | Lucille S Novak | Narka, KS 66960 | $3,395 |
25 | David J Kadavy | Concordia, KS 66901 | $3,310 |
26 | Steven T Zukowske | Belleville, KS 66935 | $2,863 |
27 | Harold R Dowell | Cuba, KS 66940 | $2,849 |
28 | Rodney Kopsa - Rodney R Kopsa Revocable Trust | Paradise, CA 95969 | $2,826 |
29 | Ruth Stewart | Polk City, IA 50226 | $2,749 |
30 | Kathryn Y Gile | Scandia, KS 66966 | $2,678 |
31 | Lynn A Blecha Rev Trust | Manhattan, KS 66503 | $2,658 |
32 | Larry E Brown Revocable Trust | Courtland, KS 66939 | $2,592 |
33 | Marchon Schuler | Palmer Lake, CO 80133 | $2,582 |
34 | Darrell G Wineinger Irrv Tr | Elkhorn, NE 68022 | $2,415 |
35 | Kenneth E Robbins | Belleville, KS 66935 | $2,247 |
36 | Los Primos II Inc | Belleville, KS 66935 | $2,174 |
37 | Benjamin Jon Vincent | Marquette, NE 68854 | $2,114 |
38 | Todd Filipi | Munden, KS 66959 | $2,113 |
39 | Charles H Vaupel | Superior, NE 68978 | $2,113 |
40 | James F Gieber Estate | Randolph, NJ 07869 | $2,049 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”