Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Rooks County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 289
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Rooks County, Kansas totaled $4,609,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Mark E Reif | Plainville, KS 67663 | $50,082 |
22 | Verl Muir | Stockton, KS 67669 | $48,489 |
23 | Donald Mclaughlin | Stockton, KS 67669 | $47,840 |
24 | Brian Pelton | Zurich, KS 67663 | $46,014 |
25 | R Alan- Alan & Corrine Dix Living Trust Dix | Stockton, KS 67669 | $42,090 |
26 | Brandon Roy | Stockton, KS 67669 | $41,529 |
27 | Regina K Muir | Stockton, KS 67669 | $41,456 |
28 | Bruce M Hachmeister Rev Trust | Natoma, KS 67651 | $40,563 |
29 | Pieper Land & Cattle LLC | Zurich, KS 67663 | $39,229 |
30 | Darren A Rubottom | Woodston, KS 67675 | $38,337 |
31 | Gregg Gartrell - Gregory And Susan Gartrell Trust | Stockton, KS 67669 | $33,074 |
32 | Timothy S Marcotte | Palco, KS 67657 | $32,190 |
33 | Rodney L Marcotte | Hays, KS 67601 | $30,412 |
34 | Steve Hahn | Stockton, KS 67669 | $29,697 |
35 | Craig A Iwanski | Stockton, KS 67669 | $29,544 |
36 | Tyler Muir | Stockton, KS 67669 | $28,828 |
37 | James Eichman | Plainville, KS 67663 | $28,195 |
38 | Daniel R Gasper Trust No 1 | Stockton, KS 67669 | $27,843 |
39 | Tim Benoit | Damar, KS 67632 | $27,546 |
40 | Brenda Werth-benoit | Damar, KS 67632 | $27,546 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”