Total Conservation Programs in Rush County, Kansas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 391
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Rush County, Kansas totaled $924,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Carol Legleiter | Hays, KS 67601 | $9,275 |
22 | Fay Dixon | Hilton Head Island, SC 29926 | $8,432 |
23 | David M & Fay L Dixon Ab Rev Liv Tr | Hilton Head Island, SC 29926 | $8,322 |
24 | Alan R Oborny | Choteau, MT 59422 | $8,279 |
25 | Arthur Kenneth Almquist Family Trust Uad 7-19-90 | La Crosse, KS 67548 | $8,160 |
26 | Cory J Wagner | Olmitz, KS 67564 | $7,788 |
27 | Darlene R Zetko | La Crosse, KS 67548 | $7,687 |
28 | Peter Mark Derr | Lincoln, NE 68516 | $7,463 |
29 | Ronald D Hanhardt - Hanhardt Rev Tr | Otis, KS 67565 | $7,363 |
30 | Long Family Partnership Lp | Great Bend, KS 67530 | $7,330 |
31 | Roxene Fletcher | Proctor, OK 74457 | $7,319 |
32 | Lana Houston | Lincoln, KS 67455 | $7,270 |
33 | Joann T Huber | La Crosse, KS 67548 | $7,216 |
34 | Donald Phillips | Colby, KS 67701 | $6,907 |
35 | Carl Legleiter | Mc Cracken, KS 67556 | $6,842 |
36 | Eyra Giesick | Scott City, KS 67871 | $6,739 |
37 | Loarn Bucl- Loarn L Bucl Trust | Sublette, KS 67877 | $6,490 |
38 | Patricia A Taylor | Los Angeles, CA 90041 | $6,410 |
39 | Richard W Stalcup - Richard Stalcup Rev Trust | Great Bend, KS 67530 | $6,204 |
40 | Larry Collins | Apache Junction, AZ 85120 | $6,113 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”