Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Scott County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 275
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Scott County, Kansas totaled $7,346,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Beef Belt LLC | Scott City, KS 67871 | $73,343 |
22 | Chad Griffith | Scott City, KS 67871 | $69,296 |
23 | Mccarty Farms Scott City LLC | Colby, KS 67701 | $68,954 |
24 | Jan Wilkinson | Scott City, KS 67871 | $65,447 |
25 | Ross Duff | Scott City, KS 67871 | $64,482 |
26 | Wiechman Land & Cattle | Scott City, KS 67871 | $61,539 |
27 | Winderlin Farms | Scott City, KS 67871 | $60,560 |
28 | Rose Farms Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $58,244 |
29 | Brent Manwarren | Garden City, KS 67846 | $58,232 |
30 | Joel Miller | Scott City, KS 67871 | $58,030 |
31 | William H Nolan III | Scott City, KS 67871 | $53,686 |
32 | Tip Off Farms | Scott City, KS 67871 | $52,830 |
33 | Dry Lake Farms | Scott City, KS 67871 | $52,819 |
34 | C Arrow Farms Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $50,705 |
35 | Hell Creek Ranch Inc | El Dorado Springs, MO 64744 | $48,282 |
36 | Baker Boys Haying | Marienthal, KS 67863 | $39,789 |
37 | Shelly R Turner | Scott City, KS 67871 | $38,869 |
38 | Brent D Turner | Scott City, KS 67871 | $38,788 |
39 | Sheridan Aden | Scott City, KS 67871 | $38,600 |
40 | Gooden Enterprises LLC | Scott City, KS 67871 | $38,183 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”