Counter Cyclical Program in Scott County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 867
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Scott County, Kansas totaled $5,598,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Cheney Farms Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $49,152 |
22 | Savolts Inc | Garden City, KS 67846 | $48,912 |
23 | Charles L Griffith Revocable Trust | Scott City, KS 67871 | $48,828 |
24 | Van L Buckner Revocable Trust | Scott City, KS 67871 | $48,802 |
25 | Wilkens Inc | Gt Barrington, MA 01230 | $46,551 |
26 | Ronald C Weathers | Scott City, KS 67871 | $46,355 |
27 | Rose Farms Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $43,767 |
28 | Dallas Savolt | Garden City, KS 67846 | $42,740 |
29 | Jerald Doornbos | Scott City, KS 67871 | $41,347 |
30 | Frick Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $39,868 |
31 | Duff Land & Cattle Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $38,793 |
32 | Dearden Brothers | Scott City, KS 67871 | $37,472 |
33 | Doug Eugene Bahm | Scott City, KS 67871 | $37,053 |
34 | Jon R Buehler Living Tr | Scott City, KS 67871 | $36,323 |
35 | Luann Buehler Living Trust | Scott City, KS 67871 | $36,318 |
36 | H Vance Wiechman | Scott City, KS 67871 | $35,249 |
37 | Four B Farms | Scott City, KS 67871 | $35,162 |
38 | 01 Cattle Co Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $34,608 |
39 | Paul F Strickert | Scott City, KS 67871 | $34,425 |
40 | Hlm Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $34,257 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”