Loan Deficiency in Scott County, Kansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,346
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Scott County, Kansas totaled $27,167,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Steven D Compton | Scott City, KS 67871 | $198,282 |
22 | Allan Hoeme | Scott City, KS 67871 | $195,111 |
23 | Lone Tree Farm, Gp | Scott City, KS 67871 | $192,070 |
24 | Griffith Cattle Co Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $186,946 |
25 | Ljv Farms Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $185,635 |
26 | Terrence A Berning | Scott City, KS 67871 | $183,531 |
27 | Savolts Inc | Garden City, KS 67846 | $181,922 |
28 | Dallas Savolt | Garden City, KS 67846 | $178,840 |
29 | Flying V Farms Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $177,917 |
30 | H Vance Wiechman | Scott City, KS 67871 | $177,155 |
31 | Rose Farms Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $176,895 |
32 | Van L Buckner Revocable Trust | Scott City, KS 67871 | $174,308 |
33 | Janssen Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $169,233 |
34 | Mike L Ellis | Scott City, KS 67871 | $167,687 |
35 | Jon R Buehler Living Tr | Scott City, KS 67871 | $165,750 |
36 | Doug Eugene Bahm | Scott City, KS 67871 | $163,521 |
37 | Luann Buehler Living Trust | Scott City, KS 67871 | $162,422 |
38 | David-david Metzger Metzger | Scott City, KS 67871 | $160,846 |
39 | Prima Land Inc | Scott City, KS 67871 | $159,545 |
40 | Mal Content Farm Corp | Scott City, KS 67871 | $158,954 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”