Total Conservation Programs in Scott County, Kansas, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 584

Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Scott County, Kansas totaled $22,936,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Conservation Programs
1995-2023
21Ruth H Nuss Trust No 1Great Bend, KS 67530$186,116
22Zanobia Farm & Ranch IncScott City, KS 67871$181,146
23Norma J BaysdorferMesa, AZ 85208$179,594
24Patricia J Shirk Lvg Rev TrHutchinson, KS 67502$179,579
25Shirley J Hueftle TrustScott City, KS 67871$179,419
26Charles Drew TrustMesa, AZ 85208$178,933
27Sleeping Indian LpJackson, WY 83002$177,961
28Richard E Rudzik Tr Dated June 22 1992Ulysses, KS 67880$175,248
29Hoeme Ranch & Cattle LLCScott City, KS 67871$174,026
30Cynthia - Cynthia D Bradstreet Rev Trust D BradstrDighton, KS 67839$172,855
31Dale W DickhutScott City, KS 67871$167,872
32Harold White TrustScott City, KS 67871$160,588
33Isaac Land IncPeoria, AZ 85383$158,900
34Steven D ComptonScott City, KS 67871$156,512
35David W Grothusen TrustScott City, KS 67871$154,162
36Lois Binkley Testamentary TrustPratt, KS 67124$153,067
37William-wm Huseman T A HusemanEl Dorado Springs, MO 64744$152,522
38Martin & Mary Ellen Huschka TrustGarden City, KS 67846$146,043
39Land Management By Design LLCManhattan, KS 66503$139,801
40Margie BerryScott City, KS 67871$139,676

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag