Farm Subsidy information
Hickman County, Kentucky
Total Subsidies in Hickman County, Kentucky, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,556
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Hickman County, Kentucky totaled $160,863,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | J T Workman Farms Inc | Clinton, KY 42031 | $1,226,109 |
22 | Ray Farms | Clinton, KY 42031 | $1,214,538 |
23 | William T Harper | Clinton, KY 42031 | $1,151,202 |
24 | Triple G Farms | Arlington, KY 42021 | $1,140,680 |
25 | Hilliard Farm | Clinton, KY 42031 | $1,117,989 |
26 | James Kenneth Davis | Clinton, KY 42031 | $1,098,388 |
27 | Dj Stephens Farms LLC | Wingo, KY 42088 | $1,076,632 |
28 | J T Workman Jr | Clinton, KY 42031 | $1,057,234 |
29 | James R Stephens | Wingo, KY 42088 | $998,486 |
30 | Debra R Weatherford | Clinton, KY 42031 | $945,202 |
31 | Robert A Edwards | Clinton, KY 42031 | $930,562 |
32 | Gregory L Grubbs | Clinton, KY 42031 | $930,041 |
33 | Karen Harper | Clinton, KY 42031 | $908,423 |
34 | Hancock Farms Inc | Fulton, KY 42041 | $872,832 |
35 | Phelps Farms Inc | South Fulton, TN 38257 | $842,550 |
36 | Joe Samuel | Clinton, KY 42031 | $814,052 |
37 | Paul F Phelps | South Fulton, TN 38257 | $806,622 |
38 | Nancy Davis Deganz Production LLC | Clinton, KY 42031 | $762,733 |
39 | Dillard Farms Inc | Clinton, KY 42031 | $753,616 |
40 | Thomas E Hancock Jr | Fulton, KY 42041 | $739,357 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”