Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Calcasieu Parish, Louisiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 143
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Calcasieu Parish, Louisiana totaled $1,548,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Jamie Renee Natali | Iowa, LA 70647 | $181,873 |
2 | First Guaranty Bank ** | Abbeville, LA 70511 | $147,944 |
3 | , | $102,233 | |
4 | Joan Habetz | Vinton, LA 70668 | $87,840 |
5 | Janice Baty | Sulphur, LA 70665 | $75,529 |
6 | Frederick Joseph Habetz | Vinton, LA 70668 | $73,200 |
7 | Edward Buryl Baty | Sulphur, LA 70665 | $61,062 |
8 | Kurt Gayle | Bell City, LA 70630 | $58,262 |
9 | Jessica D Aguillard | Lake Charles, LA 70607 | $56,646 |
10 | Jordan B Aguillard | Lake Charles, LA 70607 | $47,206 |
11 | Bradley Joseph Habetz | Vinton, LA 70668 | $46,880 |
12 | Brady Scott Harrington | Iowa, LA 70647 | $37,464 |
13 | , | $37,363 | |
14 | , | $37,363 | |
15 | Leonards Brothers Farm | Bell City, LA 70630 | $35,765 |
16 | Lynda D Danos | Iowa, LA 70647 | $33,826 |
17 | Wilfred J Danos Jr | Iowa, LA 70647 | $27,712 |
18 | Pamela A Schultz | Bell City, LA 70630 | $27,113 |
19 | Craig Charles Schultz | Bell City, LA 70630 | $22,594 |
20 | Charles Herman Schultz II | Bell City, LA 70630 | $21,376 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>